Can Miliband really be a serious contender for Europe’s foreign affairs chief?

Miliband 3There is no doubt that David Miliband is bright, intelligent – and on occasions charming.  However, becoming Foreign Secretary seems to have gone to his head.  He has made too many accidental gaffes, and too many serious errors of judgement, for him to be considered as being a serious contender for the post of the European foreign affairs chief.

Yet the campaign for him to get this important post is gathering momentum as the front page headline in today’s Sunday Times, “No 10 backs Miliband for Brussels”, seems to suggest. As the article goes on to say, “senior No 10 sources have revealed that Brown believes Miliband is ideally qualified for the job”.  What does this say about Gordon Brown?  What does it say about others in Europe who seem to be supporting his campaign?  Indeed, what does it say about the European Union itself?  While Miliband currently denies that he is a candidate, the Sunday Times has been told that “he has had a series of conversations with senior European politicians about the Brussels job”.

First there was the banana incident – when he was photographed smirking at the Labour Party conference in 2008.  His defence according to the BBC: “Asked about the picture of the banana on the Andrew Marr Show, Mr Miliband said he was holding it because it was his Miliband 1breakfast, adding that worse things could happen and he did not take such things too seriously”.

But then there were also the photographs of him shaking hands with Gordon Brown at the conference – his face looked so pained that, although he avowed that the Prime Minister had his support, many suspected otherwise.

Whatever one thinks of the notion that a single person should represent the European Union’s foreign policy, if such a post is created it is of  critical importance that its incumbent is someone who is widely respected, who has astute political judgement, and is cultured in a deep understanding of foreign diplomacy.  It is here that Miliband seems to have failed so surprisingly in his role as the UK’s Foreign Secretary.  Take, for example, his visit to India at the start of 2009.  Underneath a headline “Miliband’s trip to India ‘a disaster’, after Kashmir gaffe”, the UK’s Indpendent newspaper commented that “David Miliband was beginning to look as accident-prone as Mr Bean last night after yet another adventure backfired. After ruining his chance of the Labour leadership by gurning at the cameras while brandishing a banana, the Foreign Secretary’s visit to India last week was labelled a “disaster” by the country’s leading politicians. He was accused of being “aggressive in tone and manner” in a meeting with the Indian Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, and dismissed as a “young man” by senior officials”.  Typical of comments in India was V. Isvarmurti‘s political blog: “When he was appointed as Britain’s Foreign Minister he was supposed to be the youngest to that post for some thirty years. As such he was looked upon as a man of promise and also a bit too young or too premature to that post. He now proves, once in India, he is both premature and a bit over-excited too. Considering he comes to India with the knowledge that India was Britain’s one-time colony, he must have imagined and as most, it seems, may be still people there in Britian seem to imagine they can take India and the Indians granted. Much more shocking was the conduct of this visiting dignitary. He was both arrogant, aggressive as well as a bit hectoring. He seems to have imagined that he can talk and behave as he is used to, may be at home, back in Britain where such conduct and behaviour might be appreciated and considered as a sign of cleverness. But the young man was not only brash he was also a bit crass in not knowing good manners and etiquette”.

In the light of such comments, I find it difficult to understand why so many eminent people think that he should become Europe’s foreign affairs chief.


Filed under Ethics

5 responses to “Can Miliband really be a serious contender for Europe’s foreign affairs chief?

  1. smatthews

    What’s interesting as well about Miliband being considered for this post is that somehow the argument being made against Blair is not simultaneously being levied against Miliband. Many have questioned whether Blair is the best candidate since he’s from the UK and the UK is not in the euro area or Schengen zone, yet can’t the same be said for Miliband? Or is it really that Blair’s candidacy is overwhelmingly tainted due to his perception as being Bush’s buddy during the Iraq War and the above grievances are just a diversion? Regardless though, the foreign affairs chief needs to be someone who is widely respected around the world, so Miliband’s gaffes may present a bit of an issue as you highlight.

  2. David Milliband is a briliant young politician and is much better option Blair who made Britian look weak by befriending Bussh in the Iraq war, but remember, lot of people in Europe doubt the idea of giving such a role to Milliband of U.K that is not part of the single currency, has not joined the Schengen open borders system and has ofcourse a long history of Euroscepticism.

    • unwin

      Hi Saeed Aden

      Thanks for this

      An interesting set of observations. I must say, though, that I have not seen the evidence for your claim that he is a brilliant young politician. He was in many ways an excellent head of Tony Blair’s policy unit, but I think he has made some serious errors of judgement as Foreign Secretary.

      On Euroscepticism, there are many definitions (for elaboration see my book “A European Geography”) – but I would note, for example, that people in Britain hold many different views on Europe, and it is difficult to generalise. One can be a passionate European, but sceptical of the corruption and waste in the way in which the European Commission now operates!


  3. Kevin Maley

    Is Brussels where Labour politicians go to retire? Seems a bit odd to have a possibility of Blair as President and Mr. Miliband as Foreign Affairs Secretary or whatever the bloody post is called. In either case Miliband seems uniquely unqualified in that his tenure as Foreign Secretary is so short. However whats interesting is the Iraq war left a score of Foreign Secretaries tainted as either too pro-war (Jack Straw) or too anti-Anglo (de Villepin). Jack Straw always struck me as a nice fellow but his position on the war would sour my vote. Perhaps Miliband is just a token British nomination (not to be taken seriously) while the real weight goes to Blair’s bid for the Presidency. For the sake of Europe, I hope both candidacies fail.

  4. unwin

    Good to see that in the end, both he and other European leaders had better ideas – but had any expected Catherine Ashton to get the job?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s